This image represents two attempts by the artist to depict the full range of women’s bodies. It’s skillfully drawn and it’s wonderful to see more than the usual tiny range of bodies. But to me, it just goes to show how deep the disconnect between society thinks of women’s bodies (even us women) and what women’s bodies are actually like, and how reductive “beauty” can be.
At a glance, it seems diverse, but where is the body hair? Where are the scars? Where are the disabled women, the amputees, the transsexual women, the women who don’t perform femininity, the women with spots, freckles, stretch marks or big, hobbit feet? Where is the woman with a double mastectomy which saved her life?
Of course it would have been very difficult (or impossible?) for the artist to have incorporated all of those things. That’s the point. As long as we try to say “we’re all beautiful” by pushing out at the edges of beauty norms (some of which are almost invisible if not looking - who here noticed the lack of body hair?) we’re doomed to fail.
The sixth woman along is beautiful because she figured out how to unblock her sink by shutting off the water, unscrewing the pipe, washing it out and fixing it back on, and her hands got covered in gloopy crap while she did it. Woman number twelve is beautiful because she can spin fire hoops. Woman one is beautiful because she’s an amazing academic supervisor. Woman eight is beautiful because she survived years of abuse and is still standing. Woman eleven is beautiful because of how she holds the the coffee jar beneath her nose in the morning, smells it and sighs with happiness. And all the women off-screen, because they couldn’t appear like this, or they were too busy working the first and second shifts, or patriarchy killed them before they got to the shoot: they’re beautiful too.
Yes! This commentary! Thank you!
I also take issue with the artists previous comments about not wanting to depict “obese” or ‘stick thin’ women. She withdrew them and then added to it. But I am so utterly disappointed that (if we exclude all the stuff in the above commentary about excluding ~real~ [vomit -I hate that word] women*) when she added the obese women at the end, she has her covering her body!
She looks like she is actively trying to hide her body -like it is offensive.
I love that there is ~diversity in terms of colour and size and shape, but it stops there. There is no true diversity, and it is bullshit.
I do get what you’re saying, but for myself, I want to be clear that I’m taking issue with beauty norms and internalised ideas of women as hairless, etc, rather than specifically criticising this artist.
- teenagefog reblogged this from radtransfem
- viciousdeactivated reblogged this from radtransfem
- feministkilljoys reblogged this from weepingwitch
- weepingwitch reblogged this from xthread
- noteleanor likes this
- iliveinashed likes this
- weloveyoumorethanyouknow reblogged this from femmeandfierce and added:
- fluffyfemme reblogged this from somekindofblogthing
- farzynkorevli reblogged this from radtransfem
- misssunshine23 likes this
- noelanthony likes this
- dontlookatmewiththoseeyes reblogged this from radtransfem
- 633nm reblogged this from insectaffection
- carlitacarlita likes this
- xthread reblogged this from radtransfem
- sovietsiren likes this
- somekindofblogthing reblogged this from radtransfem
- somekindofblogthing likes this
- radtransfem reblogged this from femmeandfierce and added:
- insectaffection reblogged this from radtransfem