1. To the extent that we hyper-separate ourselves from nature and reduce it conceptually in order to justify domination, we not only lose the ability to empathise and to see the non-human sphere in ethical terms, but also get a false sense of our own character and location that includes an illusory sense of autonomy. The failure to see the non-human domain in the richer terms appropriate to ethics licences supposedly ‘purely instrumental’ relationships that distort our perceptions and enframings, impoverish our relations and make us insensitive to dependencies and interconnections…
    – Val Plumwood, Environmental Culture: The ecological crisis of reason, p9

    1 week ago  /  42 notes  / 

  2. Amazon commissions new trans-based TV series ‘Transparent’

    Amazon’s sick brutality and secret history of ruthlessly intimidating workers

    oh look two links which just happen to be next to each other

    don’t ask about their labour practices, don’t tell…

    2 weeks ago  /  91 notes  / 

  3. I heard about that about four months ago. That intersectionality was being used as an adjective or a noun – a kind of feminist. It’s interesting. I’ve never called myself an intersectional feminist. I’m a black feminist that does intersectional work. I don’t have a strong sense one way or the other about how people self-identify…

    … I tend to focus more on what is the praxis. Can you tell the difference from an intersectional feminist project or organisation from one that is not, by the scope of the things that are done, by the analysis that looks at gender in relation to other systems of power and privilege?

    … But the end of that can’t simply be ‘ok, yay, it’s all on a banner’. It’s about what is enacted under it.”

    – Kimberlé Crenshaw in interview with Reni Eddo-Lodge

    2 weeks ago  /  395 notes  / 

  4. Poem to cis women

    petalsandbridges:

    Read More

    2 weeks ago  /  72 notes  /   /  Source: petalsandbridges

  5. (via petalsandbridges)

    3 weeks ago  /  26,230 notes  /   /  Source: total-queer-move

  6. Looking for the study…

    boredangry:

    radtransfem:

    cheyennecartwright:

    which correlated trans women’s sense of self worth with their community involvement/lack thereof.

    I don’t think I’ve ever cited it, but I remember when it went around a way back and was able to find a link: http://ciscritical-not-cisphobic.tumblr.com/post/56800303343/taleth-more-reports-from-the-previously-linked

    I don’t know if you’re interested in the subject or in that specific article, but iirc there was some good stuff on the subject in the article “Strength in the Face of Adversity: Resilience Strategies of Transgender Individuals” by Anneliese A. Singh, Danica G. Hays and Laurel S. Watson. Dunno how available it is online but I bet you could dig it up.

    linky linky

    3 weeks ago  /  20 notes  /   /  Source: cheyennecartwright

  7. Looking for the study…

    cheyennecartwright:

    which correlated trans women’s sense of self worth with their community involvement/lack thereof.

    I don’t think I’ve ever cited it, but I remember when it went around a way back and was able to find a link: http://ciscritical-not-cisphobic.tumblr.com/post/56800303343/taleth-more-reports-from-the-previously-linked

    3 weeks ago  /  20 notes  /   /  Source: cheyennecartwright

  8. It is demoralizing, self-defeating, and ultimately boring to try to convert individual men who are determined to hold on to their power (and a liberal man who grants almost everything but is willing to fight viciously for the last 2% can be even more dangerous than the man who won’t give at all).

    And as far as killing the men - there are so many self-styled enemies that the disposal of the bodies along would be a national problem, not to mention the problem of “womanning” the slaughter houses when there are so many more interesting things to do in a world women are just discovering. It would be quite impractical.

    – Dara Densmore, "Who Claims Men Are The Enemy?" in Women’s Liberation: Blueprint for the Future (Ace Books, 1970), p50

    3 weeks ago  /  22 notes  / 

  9. Another ploy, a little more subtle, is “Why do you want to get rid of sex?” Again this may be a smear, a bid for attention, or an honest fear.

    When it is an honestly felt fear, what he means is: “I cannot conceive of sex, cannot be sexually interested in a woman, unless I am in a superior-to-inferior, active-to-passive, aggressor-to-victim relationship with her. If you are going to insist that we must approach each other as equals you will have destroyed sex and you might as well demand permanent celibacy.”

    Dara Densmore, "Who Claims Men Are The Enemy?" in Women’s Liberation: Blueprint for the Future (Ace Books, 1970), p50

    [hyperlink mine]

    3 weeks ago  /  23 notes  /